News

Graders Can Override Camera Errors, USDA Says

USDA inspectors have the authority to override any inaccuracies they find in beef packing plants utilizing the new camera grading system. That message was delivered to industry stakeholders last week via a letter from Greg Ibach, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs.

The new technology, called the Gigabyte Ethernet or “Gig E,” launched in February 2017, and is now in place at nine steer and heifer harvest facilities that process 50% of the U.S. fed cattle market share.

The letter from Ibach informed packers and other stakeholders that USDA graders had observed that an updated version of the camera was not operating as expected, “which caused (USDA graders) to override grades at a higher rate than normal,” he wrote. “During that period, all graders were instructed to assure that accurate grading was taking place and reminded that they had the ultimate authority over the final grade on each and every carcass.” 

Speculation has circulated throughout the industry that inaccuracies produced by the cameras had graded a significant number of carcasses higher than they should have been, but Ibach’s letter suggests otherwise.

Ibach said AMS made an adjustment to the cameras to bring it back into line with how the previous cameras were working. “After additional data review, we plan to make another minor adjustment and will reach out to our industry partners about the particulars of this adjustment, and its timing, when we have details.”

Ibach said AMS had heard the speculation that the cameras may have affected the grading system. “The simple fact is that a trained, impartial USDA grader assigns the final grade to each and every beef carcass. We ensure that these men and women have full authority to override camera grades when they believe they are not accurate.”

In the letter to stakeholders he also noted USDA publishes considerable market information, including grading summaries. “This aggregated data documents what we believe to be minor impacts over the last few months as a result of these necessary (camera) upgrades. Obviously, there may be individual circumstances were there were disparities that we would also deem unacceptable.”

USDA inspectors have the authority to override any inaccuracies they find in beef packing plants utilizing the new camera grading system. That message was delivered to industry stakeholders last week

Ron Davidson has a special vantage point of the new Trans Pacific Partnership. As the senior vice-president of international trade and public affairs for the Canadian Meat Council, he’s witnessed fi

Two farm state senators have expressed their “vehement disagreement” with USDA’s withdrawal of proposed GIPSA rule changes.In a letter to Ag Secretary Sonny Perdue, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa)

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is offering a searchable database of companies conforming to Good Agricultural Practice audits performed by the agency’s Agricultural Marketing Service.Found at ht

Pasture rent is an expense most cattle producers negotiate on a yearly basis and it can fluctuate based on competition from other grazers. This year cash rent pasture rates averaged $12.50/acre nation

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has cited World Best Tropical LLC, Doral, Fla., for failure to pay for produce. The company failed to pay $341,917 to eight sellers for 45 lots of produce from Febru

The future doesn’t appear bright for organic hydroponic fresh produce growers.  The National Organic Standards Board last fall tabled a decision on whether to let growers who don’t use

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Fruit and Vegetable Industry Advisory Committee meets May 9-10.  The committee will meet at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City Hotel in Arlington, Va.. The

The dollar and convenience store trend may be a downer for fresh produce consumption. That is at least one takeaway from a new report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has imposed sanctions on three produce businesses for failure to pay Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act reparation awards. The following businesses and individu