News

Cattlemen’s Debate: What to Call Fake Meat? Who Should Regulate?

A debate on which regulatory agency should enforce fake meat products is being had by two cattlemen’s groups as lab-grown “meat” is still being developed.

At issue between the National Cattlemen's Beef Association (NCBA) and the U.S. Cattlemen’s Association (USCA) is what to call cell-cultured, lab-grown “meat.” If the product is called “meat” it would then be regulated by USDA, under current rules and regulations. However, if the product isn’t called “meat” it would move to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

On July 26, several animal agriculture industry organizations known as the “the Barnyard,” sent a letter to President Donald Trump asking him for assurance USDA will be the primary regulator of cell-cultured, lab-grown meat.

The Barnyard includes NCBA, American Farm Bureau Federation, American Sheep Industry Association, National Chicken Council, National Pork Producers Council, National Turkey Federation and North American Meat Institute. They believe USDA is better suited to regulate lab-grown meat than FDA.

“USDA is uniquely equipped to ensure both elements: inspectors are on-site daily, and USDA approves all product labels to ensure products are what they claim to be and to prevent consumers from being misled. Meat and poultry processing companies have been meeting the challenge of USDA inspection for decades. Cell-cultured meat and poultry companies can and should meet the same requirements,” the Barnyard coalition’s letter says.

In a statement about the letter, NCBA President Kevin Kester says President Trump was elected to level the playing field for American products globally.

“Now, the President has the chance to demonstrate his support for free and fair markets right here at home. By supporting USDA oversight of lab-grown fake meat, the President will protect American consumers and ensure that America’s farmers and ranchers are not disadvantaged in the marketplace,” Kester says.

In response to the letter sent by the Barnyard group, a statement by USCA supported discussion on regulations but questioned if USDA is better suited than FDA.

“USCA has called on Congress and the Administration to engage on this pivotal issue and implement policies that will get out ahead of consumer confusion in the marketplace by enforcing truth in labeling and facilitating inter-agency dialogue. Cell-cultured protein needs to be labeled for what it is – an alternative food product that is not beef or meat as consumers currently know it.  As new technologies continue to emerge, a one-sized fits all governmental approach will simply not work,” says Kenny Graner, USCA president.

USCA sent a letter petitioning USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service requesting that cell-cultured, lab-grown products not be allowed to be labeled “meat” or “beef.” Graner adds that USDA will need “to continue to engage on this issue by remaining a part of the greater dialogue and issuing a response to that petition.”

The debate on what to call alternative-protein products like lab-grown meat could be all for naught as the Trump Administration has proposed a government reorganization plan that would move federal food safety functions into a single agency housed within the USDA.

Currently, the food safety inspection for products is split between the agencies depending on how the product is made. For instance, pepperoni pizza is enforced by USDA because it contains meat and goes through three separate USDA inspections. A cheese pizza would only need to be inspected once by FDA.

For more on plant-based and lab-grown meat labeling read the following stories:

 
In their August Crop Production report on Friday, USDA said they anticipate the national average corn yield to be 178.4 bu. per acre, and the national average soybean yield to be 51.6 bu. per acre. Fa

A debate on which regulatory agency should enforce fake meat products is being had by two cattlemen’s groups as lab-grown “meat” is still being developed.At issue between the National Cattlemen'

Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue announced a $12 billion program to help farmers who are currently bearing the brunt of President Trump’s trade tactics. “Today were formally announcing that the

Producers impacted by wildfires and hurricanes in 2017 are eligible for monetary assistance to rebuild and recover on their farms through the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA).A program known

Last week, several major news outlets reporting that during recent trade talks in Beijing, China proposed to buy roughly $70 billion worth of U.S. ag and energy products if the United States lifts its

USDA’s cattle on feed report, released at 11:00 a.m. CST May 25, fell mostly in line with trade expectations. Total cattle on feed was estimated at 11.6 million, 5% higher than the May 1, 2017 numbe

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announces the appointment of Carmen Rottenberg and Paul Kiecker to key leadership positions within the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safet

Under the 2014 Farm Bill, a new position was created at the USDA to oversee trade and foreign agriculture issues.  President Trump picked former Indiana Agriculture Director Ted McKinney to fill the

Continuing a 16 month trend of increases the latest Cattle on Feed report showed a year-over-year rise by 7% for April.The feedlot inventory has risen by 5% or more each month since October 2017. The

A checkoff war has farmers and livestock producers caught in the crossfire. USDA, public records laws, redirection, and decertification are snagged in a Gordian knot, and the tangle may impact the ent