Drover's News

New Technologies Contribute to Livestock Sustainability

The greatest potential for improving sustainability of livestock production depends on scientific innovation to boost productivity while reducing environmental impacts. These advancements include genetic technologies for introducing efficiency, adaptation and health traits, along with feed ingredients or other tools for making livestock more environmentally friendly.

Several recent announcements illustrate these efforts and the potential for scientific advancements related to agricultural sustainability, including a new feed additive and biotechnology initiatives.

Beta Agonist for reducing Ammonia Emissions

Ammonia gas emissions from cattle waste cause odors, eutrophication in water and potential health risks in humans and animals, presenting an ongoing challenge for feedlots. Waste-management practices can help reduce ammonia emissions and now the FDA has approved Experior (lubabegron Type A medicated article), a beta-adrenergic agonist/antagonist drug that, when fed to beef cattle under specific conditions, results in less ammonia gas released as a by-product of their waste.

Research shows the new Elanco product reduces ammonia gas emissions from cattle manure in semi-controlled, enclosed-housing conditions. Because so many variables such as feed types, weather conditions and manure-handling practices affect ammonia emissions from commercial feedlots, the actual reduction from using Experior in field conditions is difficult to predict, FDA notes. In pre-approval research, the product did not have any effects, either positive or negative, on cattle gains or feed efficiency. The studies indicated that Experior is safe when administered to beef cattle, and beef from treated cattle is safe to eat. No withdrawal period is required when beef cattle are dosed under the FDA-approved conditions described on the label.

The FDA approved use of Experior in feed for beef steer and heifers fed in confinement for slaughter during the last 14 to 91 days on feed.

Read more about the product approval and labeling specifications from the FDA.

Biotech and Gene-Editing Plans

In other news related to agricultural sustainability, the FDA last week announced its Plant and Animal Biotechnology Innovation Action Plan, with a primary goal of ensuring safety of plant and animal products of biotechnology while avoiding unnecessary barriers to future innovation.

The plan includes:

  • Veterinary Innovation Program (VIP) – The FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) launched a pilot of the VIP to offer intensive technical and programmatic assistance to developers of certain innovative veterinary products, including animal biotechnology products. According to the FDA, the program includes a set of tools to guide sponsors through the regulatory process, options to develop alternative strategies for generating necessary evidence, pre-submission reviews of data packages, and cross-disciplinary and coordinated FDA review..
  • CVM Genome Editing in Animals Public Webinar – CVM, along with representatives from FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), will host a live-cast webinar on Dec. 3, 2018. The webinar represents FDA’s initial step in its communication strategy to help innovators understand how regulatory oversight applies to their products and supports safe and responsible innovation for public health. The webinar will outline FDA’s flexible, risk-based regulatory approach and current scientific evidence and regulatory science questions that are important for the agency’s decision-making for genome editing in animals. Online webinar registration is available, along with a process for submitting questions for FDA to address during the webinar.
  • Guidance Documents and Stakeholder Collaboration – Over the coming year, the FDA intends to issue several guidance documents in the area of animal biotechnology, including guidance for industry that clarifies FDA’s regulatory approach using risk-based categories for regulatory oversight. The FDA also intends to publish draft guidance on plant biotechnology for human and animal food use.
  • Biotechnology in food production can affect a wide range of stakeholders, including farmers, food processors and consumers, both domestically and internationally, so FDA plans to coordinate its efforts with the EPA and USDA, while also supporting international

Coalition for Responsible Gene Editing in Agriculture

Industry stakeholders also are taking proactive steps toward dialog and adoption of gene-editing technology in food and agriculture, with the Center for Food Integrity (CFI), facilitating the Coalition for Responsible Gene Editing in Agriculture.

The coalition recently introduced a guide to engagement based on communication research findings and CFI’s trust model. It also includes links to additional communication resources. To develop the guide, the Coalition collaborated with universities, associations and others who have conducted research on consumer understanding and attitudes about gene editing. Common threads from this research, along with previous learnings about biotechnology acceptance, are the foundation of the material.

“Traditionally the assumption has been that if the science is sound and there is appropriate regulatory oversight, there will be social acceptance of innovation,” says CFI’s Chief Executive Officer Charlie Arnot. “But we know from experience and research that is not the way it works in today’s environment. What consumers want to know is that food producers care about the same things they do, like producing safe, affordable, nutritious food in a way that protects and sustains our environment.”

Learn more about the CFI Coalition for Responsible Gene Editing in Agriculture.

For agriculture to remain sustainable while feeding a growing global population, we’ll need scientific advancements toward greater production efficiency. At the same time, we need to build proactive messages to help ensure consumer acceptance as new technologies emerge.

Read more about technologies for reducing the environmental impact of cattle production in these articles from BovineVetOnline.

Reducing the Environmental Impact of Cows Waste

Probiotic Research Could Address Nitrate Poisoning and Methane

Feedyard Greenhouse Gas Study Analyzes Emissions Mitigation Factors

By: Amy Timmerman – Extension Educator and Jim Jansen – Extension EducatorThere are many things on our checklist as we recover from these historic floods and blizzards from the past several day. 

The following commentary does not necessarily reflect the views of AgWeb or Farm Journal. The opinions expressed below are the author's own. Once more, an extensive life cycle analysis (LCA) of the U

A fuller picture is emerging of the environmental footprint of beef in the United States. An Agricultural Research Service (ARS)-led team has completed a comprehensive life-cycle analysis quantifying

 More than 20 years ago, a company called AquaBounty Technologies developed the AquAdvantage salmon, a genetically modified variety of Atlantic salmon with a single gene from a Chinook salmon splic

Several livestock-industry groups encourage stakeholders to join in a petition and submit comments to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) for

The following commentary does not necessarily reflect the views of AgWeb or Farm Journal. The opinions expressed below are the author's own.Zoonotic diseases, such as campylobacteriosis and salmonello

U.S. Senators Michael Bennet (D-CO), John Barrasso (R-WY), and Doug Jones (D-AL) today reintroduced bipartisan legislation to increase wildlife managers’ ability to keep wildlife healthy.“Transmis

Cows and bulls searching for “moo love” now have a mobile app to help their breeders.A U.K. farming startup introduced a Tinder-style app, called Tudder, that lets farmers find breeding matches by

A proposed set of legislative goals released by a pair of Democratic freshmen members of Congress mentions getting fewer emissions from “farting cows,” but they want to work with farmers, too. The

A petition has been submitted by a group of organizations representing livestock haulers and producers who would be impacted by ongoing hours of service rules.The joint petition was filed on Feb. 6 by

Zinpro Corporation is proud to announce that Chris Reinhardt, PhD, – among the world’s most prominent authorities on nutrition, management and heat stress in feedlot cattle – has joined the comp

Gene editing technology offers potential for dramatically accelerating genetic improvement in livestock. While more research is needed, these technologies eventually could allow introduction of novel

The longest federal government shutdown in U.S. history affected an investigation into a strain of bovine tuberculosis in a North Dakota beef cattle herd, say state officials who have so far have shou

For years we’ve all seen the figure from the 2006 report from the UN’s Food and Agricultural Organization, “Livestock’s Long Shadow,” saying livestock production accounts for 18% of global g

As 2018 draws to a close, the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has released a report of accomplishments, including progress in animal disease traceability, biotechnology, in

The owners of Allflex ear tags and SCR dairy monitoring technology is being acquired by Merck. The acquisition of the Antelliq Group, formerly known as the Allflex Group, was made public on Dec. 14 in

USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is publishing a record of decision for the final environmental impact statement (EIS) on cattle fever tick fencing in South Texas.On May 31,

Statement from USDA Secretary Perdue and FDA Commissioner Gottlieb on the regulation of cell-cultured food products from cell lines of livestock and poultryLast month, the U.S. Department of Agricultu

The greatest potential for improving sustainability of livestock production depends on scientific innovation to boost productivity while reducing environmental impacts. These advancements include gene

When the Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (GRSB) formed in 2012, participants quickly realized sustainability goals, practices and measurements would need to reflect regional differences in beef